How to Improve Heart Rate Variability: What the Data Actually Shows

Informational disclaimer: This article is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Heart rate variability should be interpreted in context, and wearable metrics do not establish disease status on their own. If you have a medical condition, are taking medications that may affect heart rate or autonomic function, or have cardiovascular concerns, consult a qualified clinician before making decisions based on wearable health data.¹

If you search for how to improve heart rate variability, you will find no shortage of advice. Sleep more. Breathe slowly. Drink less. Train smart. Meditate. Hydrate. The frustrating part is that these lists are usually presented as if every tip has equal evidence behind it. They do not.

The short answer is this: heart rate variability, or HRV, often improves when recovery conditions improve and repeated physiologic stressors decrease. The strongest evidence supports sleep protection, sustainable exercise training, better load management, lower alcohol burden, and, for some people, stress-regulation practices like paced breathing or mindfulness.^{1 9 17 21 23}

Just as important, HRV is not a grade on your health and it is not a number to chase day by day. It is a context-dependent signal that reflects how flexibly your cardiovascular and autonomic systems are adapting to stress, recovery, illness, training, and lifestyle conditions.^{1 2} For most people, the real goal is not to maximize HRV at all times. The goal is to improve the conditions that support a healthier baseline and a more resilient trend.

What heart rate variability actually measures

HRV is the variation in time between one heartbeat and the next. That may sound technical, but the concept is straightforward. Your heart is not supposed to beat like a perfectly timed metronome. Healthy physiology includes beat-to-beat variation, especially when the parasympathetic nervous system, often called vagal tone, is active and flexible.^{1 2}

The field’s foundational measurement standards define common HRV metrics like RMSSD, SDNN, and frequency-domain measures such as LF and HF power.¹ Among those, RMSSD is especially useful in practical monitoring because it is a short-term marker of vagal-mediated variation and performs relatively well in overnight wearable use compared with more error-prone frequency-domain measures.^{1 36 37}

This is where a lot of consumer advice goes wrong. Higher HRV is not always better in every moment, and lower HRV is not automatically dangerous. HRV changes with age, sex, fitness, sleep status, illness, training load, alcohol intake, medication use, and measurement method.^{3 4 31} Normative values differ across populations, and the same number can mean different things in different people.^{3 4}

That is why HRV works best as a personal trend rather than a universal score. A low reading after a bad night of sleep, hard training, travel, or alcohol may simply reflect temporary strain. A multi-week pattern of suppression, especially if it travels with fatigue, poor sleep, or worsening exercise tolerance, carries more meaning.^{7 8 14}

Can you improve HRV?

Usually, yes, but not by forcing the metric directly.

The most reliable way to improve heart rate variability is to improve the conditions that support autonomic recovery. In practice, that usually means protecting sleep, building aerobic fitness without chronic overload, reducing clear suppressors like alcohol, and taking persistent strain signals seriously.^{5 9 17}

This is a useful distinction because many people handle HRV like a score they should outsmart. They look for a breathing trick, a supplement, or a wearable routine that will nudge the number higher. Sometimes an acute intervention can raise HRV temporarily. But the evidence suggests that the most meaningful changes come from system-level recovery improvements, not from gaming the dashboard.^{23 24 25}

It also helps to define what “improvement” means. For most readers, improvement does not mean hitting a specific target number. It means one or more of the following:

• a less chronically suppressed overnight HRV baseline
• better recovery after training, travel, or stress
• fewer prolonged periods where HRV stays low alongside fatigue
• more consistency between HRV, resting heart rate, sleep quality, and how you actually feel

That is a much more useful frame than trying to compare yourself to another person’s screenshot.

Sleep is one of the strongest levers

If there is one behavior that consistently shows up in HRV research, it is sleep.

Controlled sleep-deprivation studies show that even partial sleep deprivation can reduce RMSSD and HF, two parasympathetic-associated HRV metrics, while shifting the autonomic balance toward sympathetic activation.⁵ In one experimental study, three nights of restricted sleep significantly worsened HRV markers, and recovery sleep partially reversed the effect.⁵

That matches what wearable and field data suggest. Nocturnal HRV is not just measurable, it is often one of the clearest windows into recovery because sleep reduces some of the noise introduced by movement and daytime behavior.^{6 36} In validation work, overnight ring-based RMSSD tracked closely with ECG, which is one reason so many recovery platforms emphasize nocturnal HRV instead of daytime spot checks.^{6 36}

What matters most is not a perfect sleep score. It is the basics that keep recovery from eroding night after night:

• consistent sleep and wake timing
• enough sleep opportunity
• lower sleep fragmentation
• enough recovery during high-stress periods
• avoiding behaviors that predictably degrade sleep architecture, especially evening alcohol

The reason sleep matters so much is that HRV is sensitive to cumulative strain. If you repeatedly cut sleep short, push hard through fatigue, or bounce between inconsistent schedules, the autonomic system has fewer chances to settle into a stable recovery pattern.^{5 8}

That does not mean every low-HRV morning is a sleep problem. But if you want to know how to improve heart rate variability, sleep is one of the first places to look because it supports nearly every other recovery lever.

Exercise can improve HRV, but load management matters just as much

Exercise is one of the best-supported ways to improve HRV over time, but this is also where nuance matters most.

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that exercise training significantly improved HRV in healthy adults, including moderate improvement in SDNN and large effects for RMSSD and HF power.⁹ Academic research has also examined HRV changes in structured exercise programs involving people with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. That research reflects the broader science on exercise and autonomic function — it does not represent a use case for consumer wellness wearables.^{10 11}

That is the long-term picture. In the short term, hard exercise can do the opposite.

Acute resistance exercise, especially when volume is high and recovery time is short, can transiently suppress RMSSD and other parasympathetic HRV markers while pushing sympathetic markers higher.¹³ Intensified training blocks can also reduce HRV during periods of overreaching, with recovery occurring only after rest and rebalancing.¹⁴ In true overtraining, the autonomic disruption can become more sustained.¹⁵

Those findings are not contradictory. They simply describe different time scales:

• Long-term training adaptation can improve baseline HRV.
• Short-term overload can suppress HRV while your body absorbs stress.
• Chronic mismatch between load and recovery can keep HRV depressed.

That distinction matters because people often respond to a low HRV reading by pushing harder, as if the solution is more effort. In many cases the better question is whether your current training dose is appropriately matched to your recovery capacity.

Practical takeaways:

1. Build aerobic fitness steadily. Endurance-oriented and combined training programs show the strongest evidence for improved HRV over time.^{9 11}
2. Expect transient drops after hard sessions. Acute suppression is not automatically a problem.¹³
3. Watch for persistence. If HRV stays low for days while sleep, mood, soreness, or resting heart rate worsen, load management may be the issue.¹⁴
4. Use HRV as a context signal, not a dictator. It is useful for identifying when your recovery may not be keeping up, but it is only one input.¹²

One of the better editorial frames here is that you do not improve HRV by training harder every day. You improve HRV by getting fitter and recovering well enough to benefit from the training you do.

Alcohol is one of the clearest short-term suppressors

Some wellness advice is fuzzy. Alcohol is not.

In one of the strongest real-world HRV datasets available, alcohol intake during the evening was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in recovery state during the first hours of sleep. In more than 4,000 adults, recovery state (as measured by Oura’s proprietary algorithm in that dataset) fell by 9.3 percent at low intake, 24 percent at moderate intake, and 39.2 percent at high intake.¹⁶ That is not a subtle signal.

Reviews of the literature point in the same direction. Acute alcohol reliably lowers resting HRV and suppresses parasympathetic activity, while chronic heavy use can cause more sustained autonomic dysfunction that may take months of abstinence to recover.^{17 19} Even older controlled work found that relatively small amounts of alcohol reduced HRV acutely.¹⁸

This matters because alcohol often hits several recovery mechanisms at once:

• it disrupts sleep quality and sleep continuity
• it raises resting heart rate overnight
• it reduces parasympathetic recovery
• it can amplify next-day fatigue and under-recovery

For readers trying to improve HRV, alcohol is one of the highest-value variables to test because the signal is often immediate and personal. If you regularly notice lower HRV after evening drinking, that is probably not noise. The literature suggests it is a common physiologic response.^{17 18}

That does not mean every reader needs total abstinence. It means that reducing dose, reducing frequency, and especially avoiding late intake are among the most evidence-backed ways to support better overnight HRV.

Stress regulation can help, but the evidence is uneven

Chronic stress, high sympathetic load, and poor recovery routines can all contribute to suppressed HRV. That much is conceptually clear. The harder question is which interventions have enough evidence to recommend confidently.

The answer is mixed, but not empty.

A randomized trial comparing physical activity, mindfulness meditation, and HRV biofeedback found that all three reduced stress and improved psychological well-being, with no major difference between the interventions.²⁰ That suggests there is no single gold-standard stress-reduction technique for HRV. What matters more may be whether a practice reliably reduces the physiologic burden of chronic activation in the person using it.

Breathwork is one of the most popular options, and it is worth separating the strong claim from the weak one. The strong claim is that breathing near a person’s resonance frequency, typically around 4.5 to 7 breaths per minute, can acutely increase cardiovascular oscillation amplitude and may improve baroreflex sensitivity with repeated practice.²¹ The weaker claim is that every slow-breathing protocol works the same way for everyone. It does not.²¹

A recent remote randomized trial found that short daily breathwork improved mood and reduced physiologic arousal, with exhale-focused cyclic sighing performing especially well compared with mindfulness meditation in some outcomes.²² Another randomized study showed that mindfulness increased HRV both during practice and over a brief 10-day intervention, including nighttime HRV improvement, though some acute effects also occurred in a music-listening control group.²³

The honest summary is this:

• paced breathing can increase HRV acutely for many people
• mindfulness can improve HRV in some contexts, but effect sizes vary
• stress-regulation practices are helpful when they actually reduce chronic physiologic load
• none of these practices should be framed as a cure-all

This is where interpretation often beats intervention. If your baseline recovery is poor because of inconsistent sleep, excess alcohol, chronic overload, or illness, breathwork may still help, but it will usually not outperform fixing the bigger driver.

Nutrition and metabolic health matter, but the evidence is thinner than most blog posts suggest

Nutrition is one of the most overconfident sections in many HRV articles. The underlying relationship is real, but the intervention evidence is not as clean as it is for sleep, training, or alcohol.

Reviews of the literature suggest that obesity and metabolic dysfunction are associated with lower HRV, and that weight loss, training, and some dietary changes may improve autonomic regulation over time.^{27 28} Higher glucose and poorer metabolic control are also associated with impaired HRV in some studies, and metabolic syndrome shows repeated links with lower HRV, especially in women.^{26 27 31}

What is weaker is the evidence for highly specific, broadly applicable dietary prescriptions whose primary endpoint is HRV improvement. A Mediterranean pattern, omega-3 intake, and better metabolic control may support HRV, but many of these findings come from review-level evidence, heterogeneous designs, or studies where HRV is not the main endpoint.^{24 25}

So what can you say honestly?

1. Poor metabolic health is often associated with lower HRV.^{30 31}
2. Improving overall metabolic health may support better HRV trends.²⁷
3. It is safer to emphasize whole-system improvements than to promote single “HRV foods” or supplement stacks.
4. If nutrition is a major stressor, such as chronic underfueling, highly unstable eating patterns, or repeated glucose volatility, that may affect HRV indirectly through recovery strain.

That is a more defensible position than pretending there is a precise HRV diet with predictable effect sizes.

Caffeine, medications, and other confounders

Caffeine is a good example of why readers should be wary of simplistic interpretation. Some studies suggest caffeine delays parasympathetic recovery after exercise, but meta-analytic evidence does not show a consistent significant pooled effect on post-exercise RMSSD recovery, and resting effects are mixed.^{29 30}

The message here is not that caffeine never matters. It is that caffeine is not one of the most reliable global explanations for low HRV compared with sleep deprivation, training overload, alcohol, or illness.

Medication effects can be more important. Reviews note that many psychotropic and cardiac medications alter HRV meaningfully, which can complicate interpretation in medicated individuals.³¹ If someone is on beta-blockers, antidepressants, or other agents with autonomic effects, wearable HRV should be interpreted cautiously and in clinical context.

This is one reason population-level HRV findings should never be used like an individual disease-classification engine. Too many variables can change the metric.

Illness and inflammatory strain can suppress HRV

One of HRV’s most practical uses is as a signal that the body is under strain, even before that strain fits into a neat category.

Research in post-COVID populations is a good example. Multiple observational studies have found that long COVID is associated with ongoing autonomic dysregulation, including reduced parasympathetic activity and altered sympathovagal balance relative to healthy controls.^{32 33} A systematic review found that about half of the included post-COVID studies showed meaningful autonomic dysfunction, though methods varied.³⁴

The correct editorial use of that evidence is not to imply that a wearable can identify long COVID on its own. It cannot. The useful point is more general: illness and inflammatory load can suppress HRV for extended periods, and persistent low HRV during or after illness should be interpreted as part of a broader recovery picture, not as a personal failure to optimize.

That same principle applies more broadly to:

• viral illness
• travel disruption
• sleep debt
• major work stress
• under-recovery during heavy training
• energy deficit or burnout-like conditions

If HRV is low and you also feel unwell, exhausted, irritable, or unusually intolerant of effort, the most useful intervention may be less load, more sleep, and better recovery support, not a more aggressive optimization routine.

Age, sex, and genetics explain why comparisons are usually useless

A lot of confusion around HRV comes from using it like a leaderboard metric.

Large normative studies show that HRV declines with age, with meaningful differences by sex and population.^{3 4} In one healthy cohort spanning ages 10 to 89, the sharpest decline occurred in the 50s, and sex differences narrowed after age 60.⁴ Another study from MESA showed that abnormal thresholds varied by subgroup and that short-term HRV values should not be interpreted without demographic context.³

There is also an important genetics point. A 2023 study found that measured HRV was associated with mortality outcomes, while genetically predicted HRV was not.³⁵ That suggests HRV often reflects current behavior, recovery state, and health status more than fixed genetic destiny. In other words, HRV is modifiable enough to be useful, but too context-dependent to reduce to a single universal target.

That makes “What is a good HRV?” the wrong primary question for most readers. Better questions are:

• What is normal for me under stable conditions?
• Is my baseline changing in a meaningful direction?
• Does my HRV agree with sleep, resting heart rate, fatigue, and training tolerance?
• Is there an obvious suppressor I can address?

How to tell if your HRV is actually improving

The best sign of improvement is not a single high reading. It is a more favorable pattern over time.

A practical interpretation framework looks at HRV alongside neighboring signals:

• Resting heart rate: if HRV is improving and resting heart rate is stable or lower, that can support a positive adaptation story.
• Sleep consistency: improving HRV with more regular, better sleep is more believable than improvement without recovery changes.
• Fatigue and soreness: if you still feel depleted, a better number alone is not enough.
• Training tolerance: improved resilience to normal training or work stress matters more than a spike on one morning.

This is where repeated overnight measurement can be especially useful. Validation studies show that nocturnal HRV, especially RMSSD, is much more dependable than trying to interpret consumer-device HRV during active waking conditions.^{36 37}

A sensible approach is to ask whether you have improved the conditions that should support HRV, then watch the multi-week trend. If the trend improves in the same direction as sleep, recovery, and subjective resilience, that is meaningful. If the number is noisy but the person feels and performs better, the broader context still wins.

What usually does not help much

This is worth calling out explicitly because bad HRV advice usually fails in the same ways.

Chasing one-off hacks while ignoring the fundamentals

If sleep is poor, alcohol is frequent, and training or work stress is excessive, small add-on tactics are unlikely to dominate the signal. The literature supports fixing the basics first.^{5 9 17}

Comparing your HRV to someone else’s

HRV varies too much across age, sex, physiology, fitness, and device method to make this useful.^{3 4}

Reading too much into a single low day

One bad night of sleep, a hard workout, a late dinner, alcohol, travel, or acute stress can move HRV temporarily. Patterns matter more than blips.^{7 17}

Using wearables like medical verdict machines

Wearables can be useful for trend detection, but they are not clinical verdict tools, and frequency-domain outputs are especially error-prone outside controlled conditions.^{36 37}

Believing that every intervention has the same evidence quality

Exercise, sleep, and alcohol have much stronger evidence than most supplements, nutrition hacks, or generalized “nervous system optimization” claims.^{9 17 27}

When low HRV deserves more attention

Low HRV does not automatically mean something is wrong. In many cases, it reflects expected strain from sleep debt, hard training, illness, travel, or alcohol.^{5 17}

But there are situations where low HRV deserves more attention, especially when it is persistent and accompanied by other changes. Examples include:

• prolonged fatigue or poor recovery
• worsening exercise tolerance
• ongoing illness symptoms
• rising resting heart rate with continued low HRV
• large changes that do not match your usual pattern

That does not mean HRV is providing a medical verdict. It means the metric may be reinforcing what the broader recovery picture is already telling you. In those situations, a clinician should interpret symptoms and context, not the wearable number alone.^{1 31}

Why continuous monitoring changes the conversation

The best use of HRV is not as a one-time score. It is as a longitudinal signal.

That matters because a single reading can be noisy, but repeated measurement can show how sleep, alcohol, training, illness, and daily strain affect the same person over time. For teams building recovery workflows or signal-based health infrastructure, that pattern-based view is much more useful than isolated snapshots.

That is the relevant bridge to Sensor Bio. The value is not in claiming that one metric identifies disease. It is in building the infrastructure that helps people interpret real physiologic trends with enough context to tell signal from noise.

Readers who want more on that measurement model can explore Sensor Bio science or the remote care platform. The core idea is simple: protect the signal, then interpret the signal over time.

FAQ

What is the fastest way to improve heart rate variability?

For many people, the fastest meaningful changes come from better sleep, less evening alcohol, and recovering from excessive training or stress load.^{5 17} There is no universal shortcut that works for everyone.

Does exercise increase HRV?

Often yes over time, especially when aerobic fitness improves sustainably. But hard training can lower HRV acutely, so more exercise is not always better in the short term.^{9 13}

Does alcohol lower HRV?

Often yes. Alcohol, especially in the evening, is commonly associated with lower overnight HRV and poorer recovery signals.^{17 18}

Can breathing exercises improve HRV?

They can help some people, especially when used as part of broader stress regulation. But they work best as one tool inside a recovery strategy rather than as a magic fix.^{23 24}

How long does it take to improve HRV?

It depends on what is suppressing it. Some changes can appear quickly after better sleep or less alcohol, while broader baseline improvements through training and recovery may take weeks or longer.^{5 9 17}

What does low heart rate variability mean?

Low HRV can reflect strain, poor recovery, illness, stress, alcohol, or training overload. It should be interpreted as part of a pattern, not as a standalone medical conclusion.^{1 35}

Conclusion

If you want to know how to improve heart rate variability, the evidence points away from gimmicks and toward fundamentals. Better sleep, smarter training balance, lower alcohol burden, and better recovery practices are the most reliable ways to support a healthier HRV trend.^{5 9 17}

Stress-regulation practices like paced breathing or mindfulness may help, especially when they reduce chronic physiologic load, but they are usually not a substitute for fixing the larger recovery picture.^{21 23 25}

Most importantly, HRV is not a number to chase in isolation. It is a contextual signal. Used well, it can help you see whether your current load and your recovery are moving in the same direction. That is exactly why longitudinal monitoring matters, and why Sensor Bio is focused on infrastructure that helps teams interpret signals over time instead of reacting to one-off scores.

References

References (37)

1. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043-1065. PMID: 8598068. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8598068/
2. Ernst G. Hidden Signals: The History and Methods of Heart Rate Variability. Front Public Health. 2017;5:265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00265
3. O’Neal WT, Chen LY, Nazarian S, Soliman EZ. Reference ranges for short-term heart rate variability measures in individuals free of cardiovascular disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Electrocardiol. 2016;49(5):686-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.06.008
4. Ortega E, Bryan CYX, Christine NSC. The Pulse of Singapore: Short-Term HRV Norms. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2024;49(1):55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09603-4
5. Bourdillon N, Jeanneret F, Nilchian M, Albertoni P, Ha P, Millet GP. Sleep Deprivation Deteriorates Heart Rate Variability and Photoplethysmography. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:642548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642548
6. Kinnunen H, Rantanen A, Kenttä T, Koskimäki H. Feasible assessment of recovery and cardiovascular health: accuracy of nocturnal HR and HRV assessed via ring PPG in comparison to medical grade ECG. Physiol Meas. 2020;41(4):04NT01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab840a
7. Haddad M, et al. Monitoring Individual Sleep and Nocturnal Heart Rate Variability Indices: The Impact of Training and Match Schedule and Load in High-Level Female Soccer Players. Front Physiol. 2021;12:678462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.678462
8. Addleman JS, et al. Heart Rate Variability Applications in Strength and Conditioning: A Narrative Review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024;9(2):93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9020093
9. Amekran Y, El Hangouche AJ. Effects of Exercise Training on Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e62465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62465
10. El-Malahi O, et al. Beneficial impacts of physical activity on heart rate variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(4):e0299793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299793
11. Picard M, et al. Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0251863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251863
12. Manresa-Rocamora A, et al. Heart Rate Variability-Guided Training for Enhancing Cardiac-Vagal Modulation, Aerobic Fitness, and Endurance Performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910299
13. Marasingha-Arachchige SU, et al. Factors that affect heart rate variability following acute resistance exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(3):376-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.008
14. Baumert M, et al. Heart rate variability, blood pressure variability, and baroreflex sensitivity in overtrained athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(5):412-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jsm.0000244610.34594.07
15. Mourot L, et al. Decrease in heart rate variability with overtraining: assessment by the Poincaré plot analysis. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24(1):10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-0961.2003.00523.x
16. Pietilä J, Helander E, Korhonen I, Myllymäki T, Kujala UM, Lindholm H. Acute Effect of Alcohol Intake on Cardiovascular Autonomic Regulation During the First Hours of Sleep in a Large Real-World Sample of Finnish Employees. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(1):e23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9519
17. Romanowicz M, et al. Changes in heart rate variability associated with acute alcohol consumption: current knowledge and implications for practice and research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(6):1092-1105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01442.x
18. Weise F, et al. Acute alcohol ingestion reduces heart rate variability. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1986;17(1):89-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(86)90040-2
19. Ralevski E, Petrakis I, Altemus M. Heart rate variability in alcohol use: A review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019;176:83-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2018.12.003
20. van der Zwan JE, et al. Physical activity, mindfulness meditation, or heart rate variability biofeedback for stress reduction: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015;40(4):257-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9293-x
21. Shaffer F, Meehan ZM. A Practical Guide to Resonance Frequency Assessment for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:570400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.570400
22. Balban MY, et al. Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce physiological arousal. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4(1):100895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100895
23. Kirk U, Axelsen JL. Heart rate variability is enhanced during mindfulness practice. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0243488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243488
24. Strüven A, et al. Obesity, Nutrition and Heart Rate Variability. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):4215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084215
25. Young HA, Benton D. Heart-rate variability: a biomarker to study the influence of nutrition on physiological and psychological health? Behav Pharmacol. 2018;29(2-3):140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000383
26. Lage LA, et al. Higher blood glucose impairs cardiac autonomic modulation in fasting and after carbohydrate overload in adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(3):241-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0473
27. Stuckey MI, et al. Heart rate variability and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30(8):784-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2555
28. Stuckey MI, Kiviniemi A, Gill DP, Shoemaker JK, Petrella RJ. Associations between heart rate variability, metabolic syndrome risk factors, and insulin resistance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(7):734-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0528
29. Porto AA, et al. Caffeine intake and its influences on heart rate variability recovery in healthy active adults after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;32(5):1071-1082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2022.01.015
30. Gonzaga LA, Vanderlei LCM, Gomes RL, Valenti VE. Caffeine affects autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure recovery after aerobic exercise in young adults: a crossover study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14540-4
31. Stapelberg NJ, et al. Mind and heart: heart rate variability in major depressive disorder and coronary heart disease. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012;46(10):946-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867412444624
32. Mooren FC, et al. Autonomic dysregulation in long-term patients suffering from Post-COVID-19 Syndrome assessed by heart rate variability. Sci Rep. 2023;13:15814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42615-y
33. Menezes Junior ADS, et al. Cardiac Autonomic Function in Long COVID-19 Using Heart Rate Variability. J Clin Med. 2022;12(1):100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010100
34. Ferreira ÁA, et al. Applicability of heart rate variability for cardiac autonomic assessment in long-term COVID patients: A systematic review. J Electrocardiol. 2024;82:89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.002
35. Tegegne BS, et al. Phenotypic but not genetically predicted heart rate variability associated with all-cause mortality. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05376-y
36. Cao R, et al. Accuracy Assessment of Oura Ring Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e27487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27487
37. Sarhaddi F, et al. A comprehensive accuracy assessment of Samsung smartwatch heart rate and heart rate variability. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0268361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268361