PPG waveform morphology series showing compensatory reserve index changes across physiological states
Biometrics & Data

PPG Waveform Features and Compensatory Reserve: What Optical Signals Reveal Under Hemodynamic Stress

PPG waveform features can reveal vascular and autonomic responses during hemodynamic stress that heart rate and SpO2 alone may not capture. The useful signal is not only the.

PPG waveform features can reveal vascular and autonomic responses during hemodynamic stress that heart rate and SpO2 alone may not capture. The useful signal is not only the interval between beats. It is the shape of each pulse: amplitude, rise time, pulse width, dicrotic notch behavior, and augmentation patterns. These features remain research measurements. They require careful validation, artifact control, and physiological context before interpretation 1236.

That distinction matters. A pulse oximeter or wearable PPG system converts reflected or transmitted light into a waveform driven by blood volume changes in the optical path. Heart rate is the most familiar output. SpO2 is another derived measurement when red and infrared channels are available. But the raw or semi-processed waveform contains additional structure. Under stress, that structure can shift before a simple vital sign crosses a conventional threshold 7111819.

This article explains what PPG morphology can show under central hypovolemia and compensatory reserve research models. It does not frame PPG as a stand-alone diagnostic tool. It treats waveform morphology as a measurement layer: useful when paired with protocol metadata, reference measurements, and transparent signal-quality rules.

[Sensor Bio science library](INTERNAL_LINK:/science/) provides the broader measurement context. Related PPG methodology articles should link from [PPG signal quality](INTERNAL_LINK:/the-signal/ppg-signal-quality/) and [PPG-derived HRV](INTERNAL_LINK:/the-signal/how-ppg-measures-heart-rate-variability/).

What the PPG waveform contains beyond heart rate and SpO2

Photoplethysmography measures optical changes related to pulsatile blood volume. In a clean recording, each cardiac cycle creates a waveform with a systolic upstroke, a peak, a descending limb, and often a secondary contour linked to reflected waves and the dicrotic notch 356.

The exact shape depends on vascular tone, arterial compliance, venous volume, measurement site, tissue composition, contact force, and the optical geometry of the sensor 32021. It also depends on filtering. A filter can preserve timing, distort phase, attenuate notch structure, or shift feature boundaries if it is not designed and reported carefully 2225.

Common morphology features include:

  • Pulse amplitude, the vertical change between trough and peak.
  • Rise time or upstroke time, the interval from pulse foot to systolic peak.
  • Pulse width, often measured at a defined percentage of pulse amplitude.
  • Dicrotic notch timing and prominence.
  • Area under the systolic and diastolic portions of the waveform.
  • Derivative features from velocity and acceleration plethysmography.
  • Augmentation index or related contour metrics that estimate reflected-wave contribution 26272829.

These features are not interchangeable. Pulse amplitude can respond strongly to peripheral vasoconstriction. Pulse width can narrow or widen with vascular tone and stroke volume effects. Dicrotic notch visibility can fall when signal quality declines or when vascular dynamics change. Augmentation metrics can reflect arterial stiffness and wave reflection, but they are not equivalent to pulse wave velocity 282930.

This is why PPG morphology is best treated as a structured signal-processing problem. It is not a single-number shortcut. It is a set of features whose meaning changes with physiology, site, and measurement conditions.

How compensatory reserve changes the measurement question

Compensatory reserve describes the remaining integrated capacity of the cardiovascular system to maintain perfusion under progressive stress. In hemorrhage and central hypovolemia models, the body can preserve arterial pressure for a period through tachycardia, vasoconstriction, venous return adjustments, and autonomic compensation 7114243.

This creates a measurement problem. Conventional vital signs can appear stable while reserve is declining. A heart rate value or blood pressure value at one time point may not capture how close a person is to decompensation. Compensatory reserve research therefore looks at waveform patterns and dynamic responses, not only threshold values 781112.

Lower-body negative pressure is often used as a human model of central hypovolemia. It shifts blood volume toward the lower body and reduces central venous return without actual blood loss. Studies have used this model to test whether arterial pressure waveforms, pulse oximetry waveforms, or PPG waveforms can track progressive hemodynamic stress 14151617.

The 2026 Sensors validation study tested a wearable PPG-based sensor for compensatory reserve measurement during simulated human hemorrhage 1. The 2026 Frontiers study evaluated real-time compensatory reserve measurement in a human hemorrhagic shock model 2. Together, these papers reinforce the central point: the waveform can carry reserve-related information when the model is trained, validated, and interpreted within a controlled protocol.

That is not the same as saying any PPG waveform can identify shock. It means waveform morphology may contain stress-sensitive information that is lost when the signal is reduced to heart rate or oxygen saturation alone.

Evidence summary

| Measurement area | Study design or source type | Signal relevance | Citation | |—|—|—|—| | PPG-based compensatory reserve | Simulated human hemorrhage validation | Wearable optical waveform used for reserve monitoring research | Gonzalez et al., 2026 1 | | Real-time compensatory reserve | Human hemorrhagic shock model | Real-time implementation tested under controlled stress | Ortiz et al., 2026 2 | | Compensatory reserve physiology | Review | Reserve reflects integrated cardiovascular compensation before collapse | Convertino et al., 2016 7 | | Lower-body negative pressure | Experimental model validation | Central hypovolemia model used to study progressive reserve loss | Hinojosa-Laborde et al., 2014 14 | | Ear PPG under central hypovolemia | Healthy volunteer LBNP study | PPG waveform changes evaluated as early indicators | Eid et al., 2023 18 | | Plethysmographic waveform variation | Anesthesia and hypovolemia study | Waveform variation associated with volume responsiveness context | Shamir et al., 2003 19 | | Dicrotic notch extraction | Algorithm study | Notch detection depends on waveform quality and processing | Pal et al., 2024 26 | | PPG site and motion artifact | Reflected PPG measurement study | Site choice changes artifact burden | Maeda et al., 2011 20 | | Contact force | Physiological measurement study | Applied pressure changes PPG morphology | Teng et al., 2004 21 | | Arterial stiffness by PPG | Feature and machine-learning study | Morphology features can estimate stiffness under validation constraints | Abrisham et al., 2025 33 |

Key morphology features under hemodynamic stress

Pulse amplitude

Pulse amplitude is often the first visible marker people notice in a PPG waveform. It reflects the pulsatile optical change at the sensor site. During sympathetic vasoconstriction, peripheral pulse amplitude can decrease even when central pressure is maintained 192246.

That makes amplitude useful and fragile. It may carry information about peripheral vascular tone, but it is also sensitive to temperature, sensor pressure, local perfusion, and contact mechanics 2122. A falling amplitude cannot be interpreted as a reserve measurement without site and context.

Rise time and pulse width

Rise time captures how quickly the waveform ascends from pulse foot to peak. Pulse width captures how long the pulse remains above a defined amplitude threshold. These features can change with vascular tone, arterial compliance, and stroke volume dynamics 46.

Under central hypovolemia, reduced venous return and compensatory vasoconstriction can alter both timing and contour. These changes are not unique to one physiological cause. They are best used as inputs to a model, not as isolated clinical statements 71018.

Dicrotic notch behavior

The dicrotic notch appears on the descending limb of the pulse waveform and relates to aortic valve closure, reflected waves, and vascular properties. In PPG, it can be visible, blunted, shifted, or absent depending on site, age, vascular tone, and processing 262730.

Notch features are attractive because they provide more structure than a peak-to-peak interval. They are also difficult. Pal et al. proposed an algorithm to detect dicrotic notches in arterial pressure and PPG waveforms, which highlights the need for reproducible detection rules 26. Joachim et al. used dicrotic notch and perfusion index features in real-time mean arterial pressure estimation research 27. These studies support notch analysis as a research feature, not as a stand-alone conclusion.

Augmentation index and reflected-wave features

Augmentation index estimates how reflected pressure waves contribute to the pulse contour. It has been studied in arterial stiffness research and compared with pulse wave velocity, ambulatory arterial stiffness index, and other vascular measures 282931.

PPG-derived augmentation features can be useful because optical waveforms are easier to collect continuously than direct arterial waveforms. But transfer from pressure waveform concepts to PPG must be validated. Diastolic augmentation index and enhanced finger PPG analysis have shown promise in arterial stiffness estimation, but methods vary and reference standards matter 303233.

Derivative and machine-learning features

Derivative PPG transforms the pulse into velocity and acceleration curves. These can make inflection points more visible and generate features related to vascular aging or stiffness 46. Machine-learning models can then combine multiple features rather than relying on a single notch or width measure 91033.

This helps explain why compensatory reserve research often uses waveform ensembles. The physiological state is integrated. The model should be too. Still, explainability matters. Bedolla et al. specifically examined feature selection and subject variability in compensatory reserve modeling, which is a useful guardrail for any feature-heavy system 10.

Why heart rate and SpO2 are not enough

Heart rate and SpO2 are valuable signals. They are also reduced signals. Heart rate removes beat shape. SpO2 summarizes wavelength-specific absorption into a saturation estimate. Neither tells the full story of pulse morphology.

During compensated stress, heart rate may rise, but the pattern is not specific. Blood pressure may remain preserved until reserve is low. SpO2 may remain normal when the primary problem is circulating volume or vascular compensation rather than oxygen saturation 7113840.

The reserve concept exists because compensation can hide instability. Moulton et al. framed the compensatory reserve index as a way to quantify how much physiological capacity remains before decompensation 11. Later work extended the measurement approach using pulse oximetry waveforms and wearable sensors 81213.

PPG morphology fits this problem because the waveform is shaped by vascular tone and pulsatile flow. It can preserve information that simple averages discard. But the waveform also brings new failure modes. More features do not automatically mean more truth.

Measurement limitations that determine whether morphology is interpretable

Site selection

PPG varies by body location. Finger, wrist, ear, forehead, and other sites differ in perfusion, tissue thickness, motion exposure, and vasoconstrictive response 20454849. A model trained at one site may not transfer cleanly to another.

This matters under stress. Peripheral sites can vasoconstrict. Central or less peripheral sites may preserve signal differently. Eid et al. specifically studied ear PPG waveform behavior during LBNP-induced central hypovolemia, which reflects this site-selection problem 18.

Contact force and sensor mechanics

Contact pressure changes the optical path and local vascular bed. Teng et al. showed that contacting force affects PPG signals 21. Too little pressure can increase motion artifact. Too much pressure can compress vessels and distort amplitude or contour.

For wearable research, sensor mechanics are part of the measurement. Strap tension, ring fit, skin interface, and motion state should be reported as protocol variables, not treated as background details.

Motion artifact

Motion can create periodic or irregular signals that overlap with the cardiac waveform. Independent component analysis, adaptive filters, synthetic artifact generation, and signal-quality indices all attempt to separate physiological signal from motion contamination 202324.

Motion is not only noise. It can bias which pulses survive quality control. If low-amplitude pulses are more likely to be rejected, downstream morphology distributions can shift. Transparent artifact rules are therefore part of scientific validity.

Filtering and phase distortion

PPG morphology depends on timing. Filters can distort phase, shift the dicrotic notch, or alter pulse width. Lapitan et al. showed that digital IIR filtering can introduce phase distortions in PPG signals 25.

This is critical for morphology research. Reporting only the final feature list is not enough. The preprocessing chain should state sampling rate, filter type, cutoff frequencies, phase handling, resampling, interpolation, and pulse segmentation rules.

Vasoconstriction and perfusion limits

Peripheral vasoconstriction can reduce pulse amplitude and challenge pulse oximetry accuracy 22. Studies comparing sensor sites during vasopressor use and critical illness show that location and perfusion state affect optical measurement performance 4849.

Under hemodynamic stress, this is not a side issue. It is the physiology being measured and a source of measurement failure at the same time. Good models separate signal from artifact as explicitly as possible.

A research workflow for PPG morphology and reserve studies

A defensible workflow starts with raw waveform access. Summary metrics are not enough for morphology research. Investigators need pulse-level data, timestamps, signal-quality flags, sampling metadata, and synchronization with reference measurements.

A practical workflow includes five steps.

First, define the physiological model. LBNP, tilt, heat stress, exercise, vasopressor exposure, and clinical trauma contexts do not create the same signal environment 4141617.

Second, specify acquisition details. Sensor site, optical wavelength, sampling rate, contact mechanics, and motion state affect morphology 352021.

Third, pre-register feature definitions. Pulse width at 50% amplitude is not the same as pulse width at 25%. Notch timing requires a detection rule. Augmentation metrics require clear systolic and diastolic landmarks 262830.

Fourth, compare against appropriate references. For reserve research, this may include LBNP stage, arterial waveform, stroke volume estimates, blood pressure, clinical event timing, or established compensatory reserve models 121213.

Fifth, report failure modes. Missing pulses, low perfusion, motion-contaminated windows, arrhythmia, and site-specific dropout all affect generalizability. The most credible PPG studies describe where the waveform failed.

This is the infrastructure view of PPG. The waveform is not only a display. It is a data layer for research pipelines, model development, and physiological measurement. [Sensor Bio platform context](INTERNAL_LINK:/the-signal/remote-physiology-monitoring/) should connect here when available.

What this means for continuous biosignal platforms

Continuous PPG systems can support richer physiology research when they preserve waveform access and metadata. The value is not only continuous heart rate. It is the ability to examine morphology over time, under known conditions, with reproducible signal processing.

Compensatory reserve research shows why this matters. The cardiovascular system can compensate until it cannot. A waveform contains traces of that compensation: amplitude changes, contour shifts, timing changes, notch behavior, and interaction with motion and perfusion state 781118.

The responsible claim is narrow but important. PPG morphology can contribute to hemodynamic stress research when collected and validated correctly. It should not be interpreted without context. It should not be reduced to a universal score without external validation. It should be treated as a high-density optical signal whose value depends on the quality of the pipeline.

That is where research-grade infrastructure matters. Raw signal access, timestamp integrity, exportable data, and transparent preprocessing make morphology analysis possible. Without that foundation, the waveform becomes a picture rather than a measurement.

[Get started](INTERNAL_LINK:/get-started/) should route readers who need access to continuous biosignal data for research or enterprise evaluation.

FAQ

What is PPG waveform morphology?

PPG waveform morphology is the shape of the optical pulse signal across each heartbeat. It includes pulse amplitude, rise time, pulse width, systolic and diastolic contour, dicrotic notch behavior, and derivative features. These features reflect interactions among pulsatile blood volume, vascular tone, arterial compliance, sensor site, and signal processing. Morphology analysis uses more of the waveform than heart rate or SpO2 extraction alone 36.

What is compensatory reserve?

Compensatory reserve is the remaining capacity of the cardiovascular system to maintain perfusion during physiological stress. In central hypovolemia and hemorrhage models, blood pressure can remain stable while reserve declines because autonomic and vascular mechanisms compensate. Research on compensatory reserve uses waveform patterns and dynamic physiological responses to estimate progression toward hemodynamic compromise 71112.

Can PPG detect hemorrhage or shock?

PPG should not be described as a stand-alone detector of hemorrhage or shock. Research shows that PPG and pulse oximetry waveforms can carry information related to hypovolemia and compensatory reserve under controlled protocols 121819. Clinical interpretation requires reference context, validation, and appropriate use conditions. A consumer or research PPG waveform alone is not sufficient for diagnosis.

Which PPG features matter most under hemodynamic stress?

No single feature is sufficient across settings. Pulse amplitude, pulse width, upstroke timing, dicrotic notch behavior, perfusion index, augmentation metrics, and derivative features may all contribute. Their relevance depends on sensor site, vascular tone, motion, filtering, and the physiological stress model. Feature combinations are often more informative than isolated landmarks 10182633.

Why does the dicrotic notch matter?

The dicrotic notch is a contour feature on the descending limb of the pulse waveform. It can provide timing and vascular information, but it is difficult to detect reliably when signal quality is poor or when the waveform is distorted. Recent algorithm work highlights the need for explicit notch detection methods in arterial pressure and PPG waveforms 2627.

How does motion affect PPG morphology?

Motion can alter the optical path, change contact pressure, and introduce waveform components unrelated to cardiac pulsation. These artifacts can change amplitude, timing, and contour features. Motion handling requires signal-quality rules, filtering, and often accelerometer-informed context. Studies on reflected PPG and artifact reduction show that site choice and processing methods strongly affect usable waveform quality 202324.

Why is raw waveform access important?

Raw or minimally processed waveform access allows researchers to define features, inspect artifacts, test preprocessing choices, and reproduce analyses. Summary outputs such as heart rate remove morphology information. For compensatory reserve or hemodynamic stress research, pulse-level waveform data and metadata are necessary to evaluate whether morphology features are physiologically meaningful 1610.

References

References

  1. Gonzalez JM, Ortiz R, Amezcua KL, et al. Validation of a Wearable Photoplethysmography-Based Sensor for Compensatory Reserve Measurement Monitoring in Simulated Human Hemorrhage. Sensors. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/s26082513. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082513
  2. Ortiz R, Gonzalez JM, Rodgers T, et al. Experimental evaluation of a real-time implementation of compensatory reserve measurement in a human model of hemorrhagic shock. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1756626. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1756626
  3. Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological Measurement. 2007. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/r01. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/r01
  4. Elgendi M, Fletcher R, Norton I, et al. On Time Domain Analysis of Photoplethysmogram Signals for Monitoring Heat Stress. Sensors. 2015. DOI: 10.3390/s151024716. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/s151024716
  5. Tamura T, Maeda Y, Sekine M, Yoshida M. Wearable Photoplethysmographic Sensors: Past and Present. Electronics. 2014. DOI: 10.3390/electronics3020282. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics3020282
  6. Allen J, Zheng D, Kyriacou PA, Elgendi M. Photoplethysmography (PPG): state-of-the-art methods and applications. Physiological Measurement. 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac2d82. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac2d82
  7. Convertino VA, et al. The Compensatory Reserve For Early and Accurate Prediction Of Hemodynamic Compromise. Shock. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000559. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000559
  8. Convertino VA, et al. Wearable Sensors Incorporating Compensatory Reserve Measurement for Advancing Physiological Monitoring in Critically Injured Trauma Patients. Sensors. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/s20226413. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226413
  9. Convertino VA, et al. AI-Enabled Advanced Development for Assessing Low Circulating Blood Volume for Emergency Medical Care: Comparison of Compensatory Reserve Machine-Learning Algorithms. Sensors. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/s22072642. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072642
  10. Bedolla C, et al. An Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Compensatory Reserve Measurement: Methods for Feature Selection and the Effects of Subject Variability. Bioengineering. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050612. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050612
  11. Moulton SL, et al. Running on empty? The compensatory reserve index. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa811a. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa811a
  12. Convertino VA, et al. Measuring the compensatory reserve to identify shock. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001430. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001430
  13. Roden M, et al. Physiologic validation of the Compensatory Reserve Metric obtained from pulse oximetry: A step toward advanced medical monitoring on the battlefield. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004377. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004377
  14. Hinojosa-Laborde C, et al. Validation of lower body negative pressure as an experimental model of hemorrhage. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2014. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00640.2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00640.2013
  15. Cooke WH, et al. Lower body negative pressure as a model to study progression to acute hemorrhagic shock in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2004. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01155.2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01155.2003
  16. Goswami N, et al. Lower Body Negative Pressure: Physiological Effects, Applications, and Implementation. Physiological Reviews. 2019. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2018
  17. Goswami N, et al. Compensatory hemodynamic changes in response to central hypovolemia in humans: lower body negative pressure: updates and perspectives. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10974-022-09635-z. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10974-022-09635-z
  18. Eid MA, et al. Using the ear photoplethysmographic waveform as an early indicator of central hypovolemia in healthy volunteers utilizing LBNP induced hypovolemia model. Physiological Measurement. 2023. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acd165. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/acd165
  19. Shamir M, et al. Plethysmographic Waveform Variation as an Indicator to Hypovolemia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2003. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000074643.56137.64. URL: https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000074643.56137.64
  20. Maeda Y, et al. Relationship Between Measurement Site and Motion Artifacts in Wearable Reflected Photoplethysmography. Journal of Medical Systems. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9505-0. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9505-0
  21. Teng XF, Zhang YT. The effect of contacting force on photoplethysmographic signals. Physiological Measurement. 2004. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/5/020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/25/5/020
  22. Talke P, et al. Effect of Peripheral Vasoconstriction on Pulse Oximetry. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-006-9022-3. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9022-3
  23. Kim BS, Yoo SK. Motion Artifact Reduction in Photoplethysmography Using Independent Component Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2006. DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2005.869784. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2005.869784
  24. Farago P, Chan ADC. Motion artifact synthesis for research in biomedical signal quality analysis. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102611. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102611
  25. Lapitan D, et al. Estimation of phase distortions of the photoplethysmographic signal in digital IIR filtering. Scientific Reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57297-3. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57297-3
  26. Pal S, et al. An algorithm to detect dicrotic notch in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography waveforms using the iterative envelope mean method. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108283. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108283
  27. Joachim J, et al. Real-time estimation of mean arterial blood pressure based on photoplethysmography dicrotic notch and perfusion index. A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00486-y. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00486-y
  28. Jerrard-Dunne P, et al. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index, pulse wave velocity and augmentation index: interchangeable or mutually exclusive measures? Journal of Hypertension. 2008. DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282f35265. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e3282f35265
  29. Yasmin, et al. Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness. QJM. 1999. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/92.10.595. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/92.10.595
  30. Yao Y, et al. Diastolic Augmentation Index Improves Radial Augmentation Index in Assessing Arterial Stiffness. Scientific Reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06094-2. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06094-2
  31. Anastasio F, et al. The Analysis of Arterial Stiffness in Heart Failure Patients: The Prognostic Role of Pulse Wave Velocity, Augmentation Index and Stiffness Index. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123507. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123507
  32. Hellqvist A, et al. Estimation of aortic stiffness by finger photoplethysmography using enhanced pulse wave analysis and machine learning. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1350726. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1350726
  33. Abrisham AP, et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness Using Photoplethysmography: Feature Analysis and Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity. IEEE Access. 2025. DOI: 10.1109/access.2025.3626252. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3626252
  34. Mutschler M, et al. The ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: A well established teaching tool on the edge? Injury. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.015
  35. Fecher AM, et al. The Pathophysiology and Management of Hemorrhagic Shock in the Polytrauma Patient. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204793. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204793
  36. Bixio R, et al. Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00209-8. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00209-8
  37. Convertino VA, et al. Field Testing of the Compensatory Reserve Measurement Monitoring Capability: Results From the 2024 Army Warfighter Expeditionary Experiment. Military Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaf196. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf196
  38. Shen T, et al. Venous return and clinical hemodynamics: how the body works during acute hemorrhage. Advances in Physiology Education. 2015. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00050.2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00050.2015
  39. Schadt JC, Ludbrook J. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses to acute hypovolemia in conscious mammals. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1991. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.2.H305. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.2.H305
  40. Nesseler N, et al. Pulse oximetry and high-dose vasopressors: a comparison between forehead reflectance and finger transmission sensors. Intensive Care Medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2659-0. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2659-0
  41. Schallom M, et al. Comparison of nasal and forehead oximetry accuracy and pressure injury in critically ill patients. Heart & Lung. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.12.002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.12.002

BUILD ON TRUTH

Turn biometric signal into clinical infrastructure

Sensor Bio gives care teams, researchers, and digital health operators direct access to the data and workflows needed to monitor what happens between visits.